Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptions of all patient engagement in U.S. healthcare implementation activities from environmental scan, described using health equity implementation framework domainsa

From: Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan

Data Source

Innovationc

Patient Recipients

Provider/ Staff Recipients

Inner Context and Outer Context

Societal Contextb

Population with Health Disparity?c

Articles from Literature Review

 Angstman 2009 [41]

Several. Some evidence based (e.g., depression care management). Most were process improvements to clinical care (e.g., Saturday clinic, internet portal for patients)

Primary care patients or parents of patients

Primary care providers and staff

One primary care clinic; Network of clinics in Minnesota

Not specified

Not specified

 Norman 2013 [42]

Several. Evidence based (e.g., hypertension home monitoring, colorectal cancer screening)

Several

Healthcare providers

Unspecified clinics in Colorado; Single U.S. healthcare system

Not specified

Rural and frontier communities

 Pérez Jolles 2017 [43]

Parent activation to increase mental health service engagement for youth. Evidence informed.

Parents of youth with mental health needs

Mental health care staff and directors

One mental health clinic in North Carolina

Sociopolitical: (+/-) Values of immigrant cultures affect perception of U.S. health care

Latino families who were less likely to access mental health services. Spanish speaking

 Tapp 2017 [44]

Shared decision- making toolkit. Evidence based.

Patients with asthma

Healthcare providers

Many types of clinics; Practice based research network and advanced Medicaid network in North Carolina

Not specified

Yes, not specified

 English 2018 and Dickinson 2020 (same study but articles reported on two separate patient engagement activities) [45, 46]

Cardiovascular prevention strategies (e.g., improving clinical management of aspirin use, blood pressure control). Evidence based.

Primary care patients

Primary care providers

211 primary care clinics in two U.S. states (Colorado and New Mexico)

(+/-) tracked % of adults who were uninsured, living below poverty level, local unemployment rate, median income, primary care provider shortages; (+) Collaborative funded by Agency for Health care Research and Quality

Not specified. Reported clinics were in diverse racial and socioeconomic patient serving places

 Barger 2019 [47]

Prescribing primary prophylactic colony stimulating factors. Evidence informed.

Patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy

Physicians

45 clinics in National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program

Not specified

Not specified

 Browne 2020 [48]

Transitions of kidney disease care. Evidence base not specified.

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Kidney specialists

One hospital and several smaller clinics

Single healthcare system in Pennsylvania

Not specified

 Pandhi 2020 [49]

Several, e.g., depression care management, patient service centers, Saturday primary care clinics - some evidence based, most were greater process improvements to clinical care

Patients

Physicians, nurses, QI personnel, clinic managers, medical assistants

2 primary care clinics in different healthcare systems across U.S.

(+/-) One clinic urban, one clinic rural (+) increasing emphasis on patient engagement by payers (e.g., CMS)

Not specified

 Pekmezaris 2020 [50]

Home telemonitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Pulmonologists, primary care physicians, geriatricians, respiratory therapists

Pulmonary rehabilitation centers in New York metropolitan area

Not specified

African American and Hispanic patients

 Gesell 2021 [51]

Post-acute stroke transitional care model. Evidence based

Patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack

Healthcare providers, social service providers, post-acute care coordinator

40 hospitals in North Carolina

Not specified

Variety of people from urban and rural areas, varied income and education

Webinars

 Fehling et al., 2016 [52]

Several (e.g., traumatic brain injury interventions). Evidence base not specified.

VHA patients

Not specified

Research Centers of Innovation; VHA healthcare system

Not specified

Yes, several

 LaChappelle et al., 2017 [53]

Several (e.g., pain management). Evidence base not specified.

VHA patients

VHA providers

Geographic regions: Denver, Houston, Iowa City catchment areas; VHA healthcare system

Sociopolitical: (-) Unsure how to disseminate information to policymakers

Yes, several

 Asch 2018 [54]

HIV testing. Evidence based.

Patients at high risk for HIV

Primary care providers in VHA

Primary care clinics in selected regions in VHA healthcare system

Sociopolitical: (-) Stigma about HIV risk behavior makes it harder to reach people at high HIV risk

Not specified

 Elwy 2018 [55]

Several. Evidence based not specified.

Several

Several

Implementation research centers; VHA healthcare system

Not specified

Not specified

Participant Interviews / Observations

 Participant Interview 1

Several (e.g., blood pressure monitoring, colorectal cancer screening). Evidence based.

Several

Clinic and quality improvement leaders; Community health advocates

12–26 clinics in in Washington, California, Oregon; Single U.S. integrated health care system, Federally Qualified Health Center system, or two Medicaid managed care insurance plans

Economic: (-) Challenges working with insurance payers

Low income

 Participant Interview 2

Trauma psychotherapy. Evidence based.

VHA patients exposed to traumatic events

Mental health providers, clinic administrators

Several mental health clinics in one VHA hospital in Massachusetts

Not specified

Not specified

 Participant Interview 3

Notification letter informing parents their children were being placed on a treatment waitlist. Not evidence based.

Parents of children with mental health concerns (children were patients)

Mental health providers, administrative assistant

One outpatient mental health clinic; Private university hospital in New York

Economic: (-) Having public insurance made it hard to find other providers, so waitlist notification was even more upsetting to families because they did not have other options. (+) Implementation initiative funded by a health foundation because it would not otherwise be billable by insurance

People of color

 Participant Interview 4

Diabetes self-management program. Evidence based.

Latino diabetes patients or those at risk for diabetes

Clinic managers, community health worker, providers

One community clinic in New Mexico; No larger healthcare system

Economic: (+) external funder that valued community engagement

Immigrants, Latino ethnicity, mainly Spanish speaking, mainly low income

 Participant Interview 5

Several. Evidence base not specified.

VHA patients

VHA providers and staff

Seven community clinics and three larger hospitals in California; VHA healthcare system

Physical structures: (-) difficult for some to get to meetings due to lack of affordable or easy transport

People of color

 Participant Interview 6

Several (substance use or mental health focus). Evidence base not specified.

VHA patients in recovery who used VHA addiction and/or mental health services

VHA providers and staff

Selected clinics in VHA healthcare system

Not specified

Primarily Black and Latino patients

 Participant Interview 7

Several. Evidence base not specified.

VHA patients

Not specified

Hospitals and clinics; VHA healthcare system

Sociopolitical: (+) U.S. military culture facilitates teamwork. Economic: (-) Limited financial resources

Not specified

  1. Note. Examples listed in chronological order. a. Domains are from the Health Equity Implementation Framework (e.g., innovation, societal influences), although one domain, the clinical encounter, is omitted because no factors in this domain were identified in data collection. b. Societal influences could include: Sociopolitical factors (e.g., laws, policies), Economic factors (e.g., insurance), or Physical Structures (e.g., the built environment, signs, location of health care). (+) = factor was a facilitator or strength for implementation. (-) = factor was a barrier or deterrent for implementation. c. Health disparity population is defined as a group that experiences disparities in health outcomes or access to or quality of health care in within a certain health condition (e.g., HIV). cWe denoted the level of research evidence for each innovation, or whether the evidence base was unknown. Evidence informed means it has preliminary evidence for some outcomes, but not robust enough research to draw strong conclusions about health outcomes