Skip to main content

Table 2 Service and client features before and after wait-list controls received training and support

From: No improvement in AUDIT-C screening and brief intervention rates among wait-list controls following support of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: evidence from a cluster randomised trial

 

Previous Support

Active Support

 

T2

T4

T2

T4

Service characteristics

    

k

11

11

10

10

Average clients 000’s (SD)

3.0 (2.0)

2.4 (1.7)

1.6 (0.8)

1.4 (1.0)

Remoteness (n)

    

 Urban and inner regional

5

5

4

4

 Outer regional and remote

2

2

3

3

 Very remote

4

4

3

3

AUDIT-C screening rate (%)

16.0%

15.3%

12.6%

12.0%

Brief intervention rate (%)

0.4%

0.2%

0.1%

0.1%

Client characteristics

    

n\(^\dagger\)

33,170

25,874

16,295

13,648

Observations per client

2.6 (1.6)

2.1 (1.1)

2.7 (1.6)

2.1 (1.1)

Age in years (SD)

38.0 (16.3)

39.5 (16.5)

38.3 (16.6)

39.0 (16.6)

Current drinkers

57.4%

56.7%

57.6%

57.8%

Mean AUDIT-C score (SD)

3.0 (3.4)

3.0 (3.4)

2.9 (3.3)

2.9 (3.3)

  1. Note T2 = before wait-list controls received training and support, T4 = final year; k = number of services; n = number of clients. \(\dagger\)clients were identified using client IDs. It is likely that some clients attended multiple services, or that client ID was recorded incorrectly at times. Accordingly, the number of unique clients should be regarded as an estimate. One service dropped out of the Active Support arm as they changed their practice management software