Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality appraisal details of studies for Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

From: What can we learn from patient and family experiences of open disclosure and how they have been evaluated? A systematic review

Author and year

Study Method

Methodological quality criteria questions in MMAT for relevant research method (X)*

X = 1. Qualitative 4. Quantitative 5. Mixed method research

Comments

X.1

X.2

X.3

X.4

X.5

Bryant et al., 2021[25]

Mixed method

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

The inadequate reporting of details to determine the criteria of methods involved

Claringbold, 2023 [26]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Elwy, 2014 [18]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Etchegaray, 2014, [27]

Qualitative research

Yes

No

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

The second phase of the study included a conference with key stakeholders. A more systematic approach to gain expert consensus such as a Delphi panel would have been more appropriate

Formanek, 2008, [28]

Case report

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

The inherent limitations of generalisability of a case study

Gallagher, 2009, [29]

Case report

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

The inherent limitations of generalisability of a case study

Hagensen, 2018, [30]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Hannawa, 2019 [31]

Mix method research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

The inconsistencies and divergences were not sufficiently explicit in the article

Iedema, 2012 [32]

Case Study

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

The inherent limitations of generalisability of a case study

Iedema et al., 2011[19]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Can’t tell

Insufficient use of quotes to support the justification for overarching concerns themes and how these were derived

Iedema et al., 2011 [33]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Iedema et al., 2008, [34]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Iedema et al., 2008 [20]

Qualitative research

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

The approach for a qualitative approach not sufficiently justified

Kim 2021, [35]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Kooienga 2011 [23]

Qualitative research

Can’t tell

Can’t tell

Yes

No

Yes

There was uncertainty because only the qualitative component of a mixed-method study was reported

Lyu 2017 [36]

Qualitative research

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Research efforts have centred on how best to disclose errors, with only qualitative methods used to explore patients' desires

Maguire, 2016 [38]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Mahmudah, 2022 [39]

Quantitative research

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Can’t tell

Yes

Challenging to interpret the extent of OD experience only with quantitative outputs and limited generalisability

caused by differences in the research method, participants, scope, and indicators of previous studies

Mazor, 2013 [40]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Moore, 2017 [24]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Moore, 2017 [37]

Qualitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Okamoto, 2011 [41]

Quantitative research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Piper, 2014 [21]

Qualitative study

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Sheridan, 2008 [42]

Case Series

No

Can’t tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

Inherent limitations of case studies

Sorensen, 2010 [22]

Qualitative

research

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

-

Walton, 2019 [7]

Mix method research

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes, for Quantitative

No for Qualitative

The inadequate reporting of the purpose is to examine the same phenomenon in in mixed method research