Table 4 Bivariate analysis comparing EHR-utilizing initiatives with non-EHR initiatives
Leveraged EHR technologies for collecting self-reported SDOH | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Yes n (%) | Not described n (%) | ||
ADHERENCE TO EVIDENCE-BASED IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICES | |||
Gathered data based on needs of care teams | |||
Yes | 4 (40.00%) | 1 (3.23%) | 0.002* |
Not described | 6 (60.00%) | 30 (96.77%) | |
Used standardized data collection methods | |||
Yes (Used standardized tool) | 8 (80.00%) | 20 (64.52%) | 0.173 |
Yes (Used self-developed tool) | 0 (0%) | 8 (25.81%) | |
Not described | 2 (20.00%) | 3 (9.68%) | |
Used list or guide of community resources to facilitate referrals | |||
Yes | 9 (90.00%) | 14 (45.16%) | 0.013* |
Not described | 1 (10.00%) | 17 (54.84%) | |
Had referral protocols | |||
Yes | 7 (70.00%) | 8 (25.81%) | 0.012* |
Not described | 3 (30.00%) | 23 (74.19%) | |
Patient referral practices used | |||
Yes | 8 (80.00%) | 12 (38.71%) | 0.023* |
Not described/ Not clear | 2 (20.00%) | 19 (61.29%) | |
Tracked referrals | |||
Yes | 6 (60.00%) | 7 (22.58%) | 0.027* |
No/Not described | 4 (40.00%) | 24 (77.42%) | |
PERFORMANCE ON OUTCOME MEASURES | |||
Assessed process outcomes | |||
Yes | 5 (50.00%) | 18 (58.06%) | 0.655 |
Not described | 5 (50.00%) | 13 (41.94%) | |
Results on process outcomes (n = 23) | |||
Improved | 5 (100%) | 15 (83.33%) | 0.328 |
Not improved** | 0 (0%) | 3 (16.67%) | |
Assessed clinical/health outcomes | |||
Yes | 8 (80.00%) | 23 (74.19%) | 0.710 |
Not described | 2 (20.00%) | 8 (25.81%) | |
Results on clinical/health outcomes (n = 31) | |||
Improved | 7 (87.50%) | 14 (60.87%) | 0.165 |
Not improved** | 1 (12.50%) | 9 (39.13%) | |
Assessed social outcomes | |||
Yes | 1 (10.00%) | 11 (35.48%) | 0.124 |
No | 9 (90.00%) | 20 (64.52%) | |
Impact on social outcomes (n = 12) | |||
Improved | 1 (100%) | 9 (81.82%) | 0.640 |
Not improved** | 0 (0%) | 2 (18.18%) | |