Skip to main content

Table 5 Preliminary effectiveness study outcomes and process findings

From: An electronic health record-based strategy to increase PrEP decision-making among cisgender women in primary care: results of a randomized pilot study

 

Usual Care

(n = 50)

Strategy

(n = 50)

P-value

Ever Heard of PrEP, n (%)

28 (56.0)

39 (78.0)

0.02

Source, n (%)

 Friends

6 (12.0)

13 (26.0)

0.07

 Healthcare providers/Patient portal

2 (4.0)

11 (22.0)

< 0.01

 Website (other than social media)/The news

5 (10.0)

12 (24.0)

0.06

 Other

26 (52.0)

35 (70.0)

0.10

PrEP Knowledge

  

0.49

 Mean (SD)

5.5 (2.5)

5.9 (2.2)

 

 Median (Range)

6 (0–9)

6 (2–10)

 

PrEP Stigma

  

0.90

 Mean (SD)

10.9 (4.2)

10.8 (4.0)

 

 Median (Range)

11 (5–18)

11 (5–21)

 

 PrEP Uptake

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 

 Scheduled a PrEP Visit n (%)

--

0 (0.0)

 

 Opened Print Materials n (%)

--

34 (64.0)

 

 Viewed Video n (%)

--

4 (8.0)

 
  1. Italic text indicates p-values less than 0.05. Cronbach’s alphas were 0.68 for PrEP knowledge and 0.79 for PrEP stigma